Project Details
Abstract
Background: Professor Charon first used the phrase “narrative medicine” in 2000 to refer to clinical practice
fortified by narrative competence. Narrative medicine is medicine performed with narrative skill and offered
as a model for humanism and effective medical practice. The narrative concept includes examining and
understanding medical reasoning, clinical relationships, empathy, and medical ethics.
In Taiwan, little is known about the impacts of narrative medicine on medical students and clinical
teachers. Specifically, how narrative medicine plays a role in the cultivation of empathy and professionalism
in medical students and clinical teachers deserves further investigations. This project aims to evaluate the
outcomes of narrative medicine and its impacts on medical students and clinical teachers in clinical settings
with focuses on the cultivation of empathy and professionalism.
Aims of the project:
1. To retrospectively analyze the contents of narrative writing assignments submitted by medical students.
2. To evaluate the outcomes of a narrative medicine course by using a survey questionnaire for course
feedback from medical students.
3. To prospectively investigate the role of narrative medicine plays in the cultivation of empathy in medical
students.
4. To explore the viewpoints of medical students and clinical teachers with regard to teaching and learning
of empathy and professionalism in narrative medicine.
Subjects and methods:
Subjects: The subjects will be medical students and clinical teachers involved in a narrative medicine course.
Methods:
1. The protocol for narrative writing begins with a typical lecture explaining the theory and introducing
the process. The medical students were free to express themselves in many ways of narrative writing,
based on the clinical stories occurring during hospital rotation. It helps the medical students recognize,
interpret, and be moved to action by the problems of others, enhancing the humanism sensitivity.
2. Narrative medicine workshop for clinical teachers
3. Narrative medicine small group discussion: 6-8 students with a clinical teacher: reading the narrative
writing with feedback and refection during the 1 hr small group discussion. Survey by the REFLECT
(Reflection Evaluation For Learners’ Enhanced Competencies Tool) Rubric
4. Anonymous questionnaire: for feedback and empathy survey
5. Professionalism lecture
6. Semi-structured interview, Moustakas’ transcendental phenomenology and analysis procedures
The project will be conducted for 3 years.
1. In the first year: To retrospectively analyze the context of narrative medicine written by medical
students and follow up the questionnaire response.
2. In the 2nd year: To prospectively determine the progress of empathy of medical students.
3. In the 3rd year: A purposive sample of 20 medical students and 10 clinical teachers will
Project IDs
Project ID:PF10406-3002
External Project ID:MOST104-2511-S182-009
External Project ID:MOST104-2511-S182-009
Status | Finished |
---|---|
Effective start/end date | 01/08/15 → 31/07/16 |
Keywords
- Narrative medicine
- humanism
- empathy
- professionalism
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.