TY - JOUR
T1 - 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary lesions of suspected and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors
T2 - A prospective study in Taiwan
AU - Chen, Shih Hsin
AU - Chang, Yu Chuan
AU - Hwang, Tsann Long
AU - Chen, Jen Shi
AU - Chou, Wen Chi
AU - Hsieh, Chia Hsun
AU - Yeh, Ta Sen
AU - Hsu, Jun Te
AU - Yeh, Chun Nan
AU - Tseng, Jeng Hwei
AU - Chen, Tse Ching
AU - Yen, Tzu Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Background/purpose: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT to identify the primary foci in Taiwanese patients with clinically suspected neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and NET of unknown primary site. Methods: Patients with clinically suspected NET and NET of unknown primary site were eligible. All participants underwent a conventional workup (including CT, MR, endoscopic ultrasound), 68Ga-DOTATOC, and 18F-FDG PET/CT. The results of pathology and findings on clinical follow-up served as the gold standard. Results: Among the 36 patients included in the study, we were able to identify the primary tumor in 17 participants (47.2%). The overall sensitivity values of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDG, and conventional workup were 88%, 41%, and 53%, respectively, whereas the specificities were 100%, 100%, 68%, respectively. The areas under curve of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDG, and conventional workup were 0.941, 0.706, and 0.607, respectively. 68Ga-DOTATOC was more sensitive than 18F-FDG and more specific than conventional workup. Treatment changes as a result of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT findings occurred in 12 (33.3%) of the 36 study participants. Conclusion: Our data confirm the usefulness of 68Ga-DOTATOC in the identification of NET. In addition, treatment modifications as a result of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT findings were evident in approximately one third of NET patients.
AB - Background/purpose: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT to identify the primary foci in Taiwanese patients with clinically suspected neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and NET of unknown primary site. Methods: Patients with clinically suspected NET and NET of unknown primary site were eligible. All participants underwent a conventional workup (including CT, MR, endoscopic ultrasound), 68Ga-DOTATOC, and 18F-FDG PET/CT. The results of pathology and findings on clinical follow-up served as the gold standard. Results: Among the 36 patients included in the study, we were able to identify the primary tumor in 17 participants (47.2%). The overall sensitivity values of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDG, and conventional workup were 88%, 41%, and 53%, respectively, whereas the specificities were 100%, 100%, 68%, respectively. The areas under curve of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDG, and conventional workup were 0.941, 0.706, and 0.607, respectively. 68Ga-DOTATOC was more sensitive than 18F-FDG and more specific than conventional workup. Treatment changes as a result of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT findings occurred in 12 (33.3%) of the 36 study participants. Conclusion: Our data confirm the usefulness of 68Ga-DOTATOC in the identification of NET. In addition, treatment modifications as a result of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT findings were evident in approximately one third of NET patients.
KW - 18F-FDG
KW - 68Ga-DOTATOC
KW - Neuroendocrine tumors
KW - PET/CT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025465750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.07.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.07.007
M3 - 文章
C2 - 28735662
AN - SCOPUS:85025465750
SN - 0929-6646
VL - 117
SP - 480
EP - 487
JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
IS - 6
ER -