Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of immunohistochemical and molecular methods used for analyzing the BRAF V600E gene mutation in malignant melanoma in Taiwan

  • Wen Kuan Huang
  • , Tseng Tong Kuo
  • , Chiao En Wu
  • , Hsin Yi Cheng
  • , Chia Hsun Hsieh
  • , Jia Juan Hsieh
  • , Yung Chi Shen
  • , Ming Mo Hou
  • , Todd Hsu
  • , John Wen Cheng Chang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chang Gung University
  • National Taiwan Ocean University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: The BRAF V600 mutation has been shown to be clinically meaningful in terms of both the prognosis and sensitivity of BRAF inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma. Recently, a BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody, VE1, was generated for the detection of tumors bearing BRAF V600E mutations. To determine the clinical value of immunohistochemical testing, we compared the prevalence of mutant BRAF detected by VE1 with direct sequencing results. Methods: Paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed melanoma biopsies were analyzed for the BRAF mutation status by immunohistochemistry with the VE1 antibody. Sanger sequencing was applied to verify the immunohistochemical results. Results: A total of 73 melanoma cases with tumor samples from primary lymph nodes and metastatic sites were selected for this study. Direct sequencing demonstrated that 18 of 73 cases (24.6%) harbored the BRAF V600 mutation: 17 with V600E and one with V600K. All 18 tumors shown to harbor the BRAF V600E/K mutations were VE1-positive. One additional case was false-positive for VE1. The sensitivity and specificity of VE1 was 100% (18/18) and 98% (54/55), respectively. The overall concordance between the immunohistochemical method and direct sequencing was excellent (98.6%). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that immunohistochemical analysis using VE1 constitutes a highly sensitive test for the detection of BRAF mutations and suggest that this cost-effective method is suitable as a rapid diagnostic approach complementary to molecular testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-408
Number of pages6
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 12 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • BRAF V600E
  • immunohistochemistry
  • melanoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of immunohistochemical and molecular methods used for analyzing the BRAF V600E gene mutation in malignant melanoma in Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this