TY - JOUR
T1 - A "green" approach to secondary reconstruction
T2 - The concept of the recycle flap and a classification
AU - Sadigh, Parviz Lionel
AU - Hsieh, Ching Hua
AU - Feng, Guan Ming
AU - Shih, Hsiang Shun
AU - Jeng, Seng Feng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: Harvesting soft tissue from a previously transferred flap allows for flap reshaping and simultaneously raising tissue for a secondary procedure. This is done without increasing the number of donor sites and is therefore a very attractive reconstructive option. Methods: Between March of 2011 and October of 2013, the authors performed 60 recycle flaps on 60 patients (three women and 57 men) who had undergone previous flap reconstruction (52 free and eight pedicled). The recycle flaps were raised as either random pattern or perforator flaps. Mean time between primary reconstruction and the recycle procedure was 28.3 months (range, 6 months to 20 years), and the mean age of our patients was 57 years (range, 21 to 78 years). Results: Of 60 recycle flaps raised for secondary reconstruction, 58 survived completely (97 percent). Two cases of total flap necrosis were encountered resulting from pedicle damage during attempted perforator dissection within a previously irradiated flap. Twenty-nine flaps were raised as random pattern flaps, 29 were raised as pedicled perforator flaps (20 with perforator skeletonization), and two were raised as free perforator flaps. Conclusions: There are a number of ways to safely "recycle" the soft tissues used in a previous reconstruction. This provides new tissue for a secondary procedure while debulking and refining the primary flap. Raising perforator flaps from previously irradiated flaps is, however, technically challenging and carries a high risk of flap necrosis (40 percent in our series) and should be advised against.
AB - Background: Harvesting soft tissue from a previously transferred flap allows for flap reshaping and simultaneously raising tissue for a secondary procedure. This is done without increasing the number of donor sites and is therefore a very attractive reconstructive option. Methods: Between March of 2011 and October of 2013, the authors performed 60 recycle flaps on 60 patients (three women and 57 men) who had undergone previous flap reconstruction (52 free and eight pedicled). The recycle flaps were raised as either random pattern or perforator flaps. Mean time between primary reconstruction and the recycle procedure was 28.3 months (range, 6 months to 20 years), and the mean age of our patients was 57 years (range, 21 to 78 years). Results: Of 60 recycle flaps raised for secondary reconstruction, 58 survived completely (97 percent). Two cases of total flap necrosis were encountered resulting from pedicle damage during attempted perforator dissection within a previously irradiated flap. Twenty-nine flaps were raised as random pattern flaps, 29 were raised as pedicled perforator flaps (20 with perforator skeletonization), and two were raised as free perforator flaps. Conclusions: There are a number of ways to safely "recycle" the soft tissues used in a previous reconstruction. This provides new tissue for a secondary procedure while debulking and refining the primary flap. Raising perforator flaps from previously irradiated flaps is, however, technically challenging and carries a high risk of flap necrosis (40 percent in our series) and should be advised against.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964219466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000996
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000996
M3 - 文章
C2 - 25626825
AN - SCOPUS:84964219466
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 135
SP - 401e-412e
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 2
ER -