A microbiological and immunohistochemical analysis of periurethral and vaginal tissue in women with de novo urge symptoms after mid-urethral sling procedures-a prospective case-controlled study

Alex C. Wang*, Ren Chin Wu, Cheng Tao Lin, Min Chi Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aims were to determine whether bacteriainfection- elicited immune response after mid-urethral sling (MUS) may cause de novo urge symptoms (DNUS) and to evaluate the efficacy of suburethral sling excision for relieving the urgency. In a period of 40 months, 360 consecutive subjects with urodynamic stress incontinence had undergone one of three different MUS. Sixty-eight women with DNUS were included after exclusion. The suburethral sling of 24 of the 68 women needed to be excised because of refractory urgency. The excised vagina, or periurethral tissue, included sling of the study and control groups were sent for microbiological and immunohistochemical analyses. Statistically significant differences in the cell density percentage of CD68, CD25, CD4+CD25 and positive rate of Gram (+) bacteria were noted between two groups (p=0.024, p=0.053 and 0.016, respectively, p< 0.001). The success rate of sling excision was 80.2%. In conclusion, bacteria-infection-related immune hyperreactivity might explain the pathologic basis of DNUS after MUS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1145-1150
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bacteria-infection-related immune response
  • De novo urge symptoms
  • Gramstain
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Mid-urethral sling procedures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A microbiological and immunohistochemical analysis of periurethral and vaginal tissue in women with de novo urge symptoms after mid-urethral sling procedures-a prospective case-controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this