Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Retrospective Comparison of Three Patient-Controlled Analgesic Strategies: Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Plus Abdominal Wall Nerve Blocks versus Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Alone in Open Liver Surgery

  • Hsin I. Tsai
  • , Yu Chieh Lu
  • , Chih Wen Zheng
  • , Ming Chin Yu
  • , An Hsun Chou
  • , Cheng Han Lee
  • , Hao Wei Kou
  • , Jr Rung Lin
  • , Yu Hua Lai
  • , Li Ling Chang
  • , Chao Wei Lee*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    • Chang Gung University
    • New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Adequate pain control is of crucial importance to patient recovery and satisfaction following abdominal surgeries. The optimal analgesia regimen remains controversial in liver resections. Methods: Three groups of patients undergoing open hepatectomies were retrospectively analyzed, reviewing intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) versus IV-PCA in addition to bilateral rectus sheath and subcostal transversus abdominis plane nerve blocks (IV-PCA + NBs) versus patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). Patient-reported pain scores and clinical data were extracted and correlated with the method of analgesia. Outcomes included total morphine consumption and numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement over the first three postoperative days, time to remove the nasogastric tube and urinary catheter, time to commence on fluid and soft diet, and length of hospital stay. Results: The TEA group required less morphine over the first three postoperative days than IV-PCA and IV-PCA + NBs groups (9.21 ± 4.91 mg, 83.53 ± 49.51 mg, and 64.17 ± 31.96 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Even though no statistical difference was demonstrated in NRS scores on the first three postoperative days at rest and on movement, the IV-PCA group showed delayed removal of urinary catheter (removal on postoperative day 4.93 ± 5.08, 3.87 ± 1.31, and 3.70 ± 1.30, respectively) and prolonged length of hospital stay (discharged on postoperative day 12.71 ± 7.26, 11.79 ± 5.71, and 10.02 ± 4.52, respectively) as compared to IV-PCA + NBs and TEA groups. Conclusions: For postoperative pain management, it is expected that the TEA group required the least amount of opioid; however, IV-PCA + NBs and TEA demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes, namely, the time to remove nasogastric tube/urinary catheter, to start the diet, and the length of hospital stay. IV-PCA with NBs could thus be a reliable analgesic modality for patients undergoing open liver resections.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number2411
    JournalBiomedicines
    Volume10
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 10 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2022 by the authors.

    Keywords

    • hepatectomy
    • intravenous analgesia
    • liver resection
    • nerve block
    • patient-controlled epidural analgesia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Retrospective Comparison of Three Patient-Controlled Analgesic Strategies: Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Plus Abdominal Wall Nerve Blocks versus Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Opioid Analgesia Alone in Open Liver Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this