A validation study comparing existing prediction models of acute kidney injury in patients with acute heart failure

Tao Han Lee, Pei Chun Fan, Jia Jin Chen, Victor Chien‐Chia Wu, Cheng Chia Lee, Chieh Li Yen, George Kuo, Hsiang Hao Hsu, Ya Chung Tian, Chih Hsiang Chang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in acute heart failure (AHF) and is associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality. The aim of this study was to externally validate existing prediction models of AKI in patients with AHF. Data for 10,364 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure between 2008 and 2018 were extracted from the Chang Gung Research Database and analysed. The primary outcome of interest was AKI, defined according to the KDIGO definition. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was used to assess the discrimination performance of each prediction model. Five existing prediction models were externally validated, and the Forman risk score and the prediction model reported by Wang et al. showed the most favourable discrimination and calibration performance. The Forman risk score had AUCs for discriminating AKI, AKI stage 3, and dialysis within 7 days of 0.696, 0.829, and 0.817, respectively. The Wang et al. model had AUCs for discriminating AKI, AKI stage 3, and dialysis within 7 days of 0.73, 0.858, and 0.845, respectively. The Forman risk score and the Wang et al. prediction model are simple and accurate tools for predicting AKI in patients with AHF.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11213
JournalScientific Reports
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A validation study comparing existing prediction models of acute kidney injury in patients with acute heart failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this