TY - JOUR
T1 - Ambulation study of a woman with paraplegia using a reciprocating gait orthosis with functional electrical stimulation in Taiwan
T2 - A case report
AU - Chen, Woei Luen
AU - Chang, Walter H.
AU - Chen, Chih Chen
AU - Hsieh, Jung Chai
AU - Shih, Ying Ying
AU - Chen, Yu Luen
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Purpose. Many patients who suffer from spinal cord injuries with paraplegia cannot recover to walk independently. They need to use a special walking orthoses to support their body to walk properly. Traditionally, long leg braces LLB were fitted to patients for walking. Unfortunately, the results were not satisfactory as this device supplies adequate support with less than optimum mobility. This study used the latest reciprocating gait orthosis RGO combined with functional electrical stimulation FES. This combination provides a greater support range while applying assistant mechanical walking structures. The FES co-ordination helps restore natural walking abilities that the paralysed patient has lost. Method. This study developed a walking orthosis with FES, using FES to stimulate specific muscles quadriceps, hamstring in the paralysed patients' lower limbs. The proposed method can achieve the benefits of physical therapeutics while paralysed patients can achieve the purpose of walking. The FES is designed with control buttons on the walking orthosis. A patient can control the left or right leg in walking and speed control via the control buttons. Results. Several practical tests were conducted on the new walking orthosis. A 25-year-old female paralysed patient L1 complete spinal cord injury used traditional LLB, RGO and RGO with FES to proceed with walking rehabilitation and clinical assessment. Heart rate difference HRdifference, mean blood pressure MBPdifference, walking speed, length of steps, number of steps and oxygen consumption comparisons were made before and after walking. The results show that RGO and RGO with FES were both better than LLB. However, the differences between RGO and RGO with FES in HRdifference, MBPdifference, and walking speed were not significant. This is because the patient's right leg reaction to the electrical stimulation was relatively low. Discussion and conclusions. In general, RGO can help the patient achieve quicker and more independent walking. The combination of RGO and FES can increase the effectiveness of RGO for more mobile aid. These two walking orthoses are better than traditional LLB. Both methods provide patients who suffer from paraplegia with better choices.
AB - Purpose. Many patients who suffer from spinal cord injuries with paraplegia cannot recover to walk independently. They need to use a special walking orthoses to support their body to walk properly. Traditionally, long leg braces LLB were fitted to patients for walking. Unfortunately, the results were not satisfactory as this device supplies adequate support with less than optimum mobility. This study used the latest reciprocating gait orthosis RGO combined with functional electrical stimulation FES. This combination provides a greater support range while applying assistant mechanical walking structures. The FES co-ordination helps restore natural walking abilities that the paralysed patient has lost. Method. This study developed a walking orthosis with FES, using FES to stimulate specific muscles quadriceps, hamstring in the paralysed patients' lower limbs. The proposed method can achieve the benefits of physical therapeutics while paralysed patients can achieve the purpose of walking. The FES is designed with control buttons on the walking orthosis. A patient can control the left or right leg in walking and speed control via the control buttons. Results. Several practical tests were conducted on the new walking orthosis. A 25-year-old female paralysed patient L1 complete spinal cord injury used traditional LLB, RGO and RGO with FES to proceed with walking rehabilitation and clinical assessment. Heart rate difference HRdifference, mean blood pressure MBPdifference, walking speed, length of steps, number of steps and oxygen consumption comparisons were made before and after walking. The results show that RGO and RGO with FES were both better than LLB. However, the differences between RGO and RGO with FES in HRdifference, MBPdifference, and walking speed were not significant. This is because the patient's right leg reaction to the electrical stimulation was relatively low. Discussion and conclusions. In general, RGO can help the patient achieve quicker and more independent walking. The combination of RGO and FES can increase the effectiveness of RGO for more mobile aid. These two walking orthoses are better than traditional LLB. Both methods provide patients who suffer from paraplegia with better choices.
KW - Functional electrical stimulation
KW - Long leg brace
KW - Reciprocating gait orthosis
KW - Spinal cord injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70749099667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/17483100903137147
DO - 10.3109/17483100903137147
M3 - 文章
C2 - 19817657
AN - SCOPUS:70749099667
SN - 1748-3107
VL - 4
SP - 429
EP - 438
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
IS - 6
ER -