Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis of a Software Reliability Growth Model with logistic testing-effort function

  • Chin Yu Huang*
  • , Sy Yen Kuo
  • , Ing Yi Chen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Taiwan University

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate a Software Reliability Growth Model (SRGM) based on the Non Homogeneous Poisson Process (NHPP) which incorporates a logistic testing-effort function. Software reliability growth models proposed in the literature incorporate the amount of testing-effort spent on software testing which can be described by an Exponential curve, a Rayleigh curve, or a Weibull curve. However, it may not be reasonable to represent the consumption curve for testing-effort only by an Exponential, a Rayleigh or a Weibull curve in various software development environments. Therefore, we will show that a logistic testing-effort function can be expressed as a software development/test effort curve and give a reasonable predictive capability for the real failure data. Parameters are estimated and experiments on three actual test/debug data sets are illustrated. The results show that the software reliability growth model with logistic testing-effort function can estimate the number of initial faults better than the model with Weibull-type consumption curve. In addition, the optimal release policy of this model based on cost-reliability criterion is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)378-388
Number of pages11
JournalProceedings of the International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1997 8th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE - Albuquerque, NM, USA
Duration: 02 11 199705 11 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of a Software Reliability Growth Model with logistic testing-effort function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this