Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft

Ching Jen Wang*, Lin Hsiu Weng, Chia Chen Hsu, Yi Sheng Chan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

97 Scopus citations

Abstract

This prospective study compared the clinical results of single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There were 35 patients including 19 single- and 16 double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. The average age was 29.4±13.6 years versus 28.2±10.4 years; and the average follow-up was 41.0±13.1 months versus 28.2±4.2 months for single- and double-bundle reconstruction, respectively. The indication for surgery was functional disability of the knee due to pain and instability as the result of high-energy PCL injury. The evaluation parameters included functional assessment, ligament laxity, functional score and radiographs of the knee. The results showed no significant difference in functional assessment, ligament laxity, functional score and radiographic changes of the knee between the two techniques. The rate of overall satisfaction with the operation was comparable from patient and surgeon perspectives. Contrary to many recent reports, the results of this study showed that single- and double-bundle PCL reconstruction using hamstring autograft produced comparable clinical results in medium-term follow-up. The difference between single- and double-bundle PCL reconstruction, if any, can be concluded only with long-term results and larger number of patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1293-1299
Number of pages7
JournalInjury Extra
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Arthroscopic
  • Posterior cruciate ligament
  • Reconstructions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this