Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing the impact of deep-learning assistance on the histopathological diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in fallopian tubes

  • AI-STIC Study Group
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Medical University of Graz
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS
  • LabPON
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • Ghent University
  • Hospices civils de Lyon
  • Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
  • University of Tübingen
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Padua
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza
  • University of Groningen
  • Maastricht University
  • Ospedale dell'Angelo
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Yale University
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
  • Linköping University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

In recent years, it has become clear that artificial intelligence (AI) models can achieve high accuracy in specific pathology-related tasks. An example is our deep-learning model, designed to automatically detect serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the precursor lesion to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, found in the fallopian tube. However, the standalone performance of a model is insufficient to determine its value in the diagnostic setting. To evaluate the impact of the use of this model on pathologists' performance, we set up a fully crossed multireader, multicase study, in which 26 participants, from 11 countries, reviewed 100 digitalized H&E-stained slides of fallopian tubes (30 cases/70 controls) with and without AI assistance, with a washout period between the sessions. We evaluated the effect of the deep-learning model on accuracy, slide review time and (subjectively perceived) diagnostic certainty, using mixed-models analysis. With AI assistance, we found a significant increase in accuracy (p < 0.01) whereby the average sensitivity increased from 82% to 93%. Further, there was a significant 44 s (32%) reduction in slide review time (p < 0.01). The level of certainty that the participants felt versus their own assessment also significantly increased, by 0.24 on a 10-point scale (p < 0.01). In conclusion, we found that, in a diverse group of pathologists and pathology residents, AI support resulted in a significant improvement in the accuracy of STIC diagnosis and was coupled with a substantial reduction in slide review time. This model has the potential to provide meaningful support to pathologists in the diagnosis of STIC, ultimately streamlining and optimizing the overall diagnostic process.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70006
Pages (from-to)e70006
JournalJournal of Pathology: Clinical Research
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 2024

Bibliographical note

© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • STIC
  • artificial intelligence
  • computational pathology
  • deep learning
  • high-grade serous carcinoma
  • histopathology
  • serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Deep Learning
  • Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/diagnosis
  • Carcinoma in Situ/pathology
  • Female
  • Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology
  • Observer Variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the impact of deep-learning assistance on the histopathological diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in fallopian tubes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this