Benefits of late coronary artery stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction with and without thrombolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND: There are no added benefits when balloon angioplasty is conducted in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not thrombolysis has an impact on the outcome of late coronary artery stenting following acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: The outcome of late coronary artery stenting in the infarct-related artery following acute infarction was compared in patients with (68 patients, group A) and without (118 patients, group B) prior thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups except that total occlusion of the infarct-related artery was more common in group B. The angiographic characteristics of the target lesion were similar in the 2 groups; the procedural success rate was 98% in both groups. There was no subacute thrombosis or other complications in either group. The 6-month follow-up coronary angiography and the restenosis rate was 18% in both groups; the reocclusion rate was 2% in group A and 4% in group B. The increment of the left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in both groups (6% versus 7%). During a follow-up duration of 18 +/- 3 months, the mortality rate was 3% versus 2%, reinfarction 0% versus 1%, recurrent angina 6% versus 4%, and target lesion revascularization by angioplasty 13% versus 13% in group A and B patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The outcome of late coronary artery stenting following acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without prior thrombolytic therapy was comparable. Significant improvement of left ventricular function was noted in both groups.