Benefits of palliative surgery for far-advanced gastric cancer

Background: The optimum strategy for palliative surgery in gastric cancer patients remains undetermined. Methods: In total, 525 patients who had undergone palliative surgery between 1994 and 2000 were evaluated in terms of operative mortality, survival, and palliative effect. Patients were grouped according to the UICC's classification of residual tumors (R) after the operation: microscopic residual tumor (R1) (N = 104) and macroscopic residual tumor (R2) (N = 421). Gastric resection was performed in all R1 patients and in 257 of the R2 patients. Non-resection procedures were performed in 164 of the R2 patients, including gastroje-junostomies in 64, gastrostomies in 17, jejunostomies in 60, and laparotomies only in 23. Results: The operative mortality did not significantly differ among R1 distal gastrectomies (4.5%), R2 distal gastrectomies (3.3%), and R1 total gastrectomies (2.9%) (p = 0.919). R2 total gastrectomies showed a particularly higher operative mortality (10.9%) than did the other resection procedures. The survival time and palliative duration were significantly longer in patients after palliative resection than after non-resection operations. Postoperative chemotherapy prolonged the survival time of patients after palliative surgery. Conclusion: R1 or R2 distal gastrectomies and R1 total gastrectomies have benefits of survival prolongation and symptomatic palliation. However, the use of a total gastrectomy in R2 patients must be selectively reserved for faradvanced cases, otherwise it should be replaced with less-invasive procedures to avoid a high operative mortality rate. Postoperative chemotherapy is useful for prolonging survival time.