Bladeless trocar versus traditional trocar for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

S. Y. Huang*, S. Y. Wang, C. N. Yeh, C. T. Cheng, C. Y. Tsai, Y. Y. Liu, C. C. Lin, Y. Y. Jan, M. F. Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a standard treatment for gallbladder lesions. However, it is not pain-free. This study compared pain intensity between using traditional and bladeless trocar for LC. Method: Ninety-one consecutive patients undergoing LC were categorized into two groups, including bladeless (BL) and traditional group. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess postoperative pain (in the recovery unit, 6, 24 h after surgery, and before discharge) and the amount of analgesics use was also recorded. Results: BL group patients had a lower VAS than those of the control group patients after LC. Especially, BL group patients had an immediate significant lower VAS than that in the control group patients, explaining significant less meperidine requirement in BL group. Conclusions: Bladeless trocar may work in the early postoperative stage, demonstrated by less pain score. This short-term benefit explained less meperidine use in early hours after LC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408-412
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 2012

Keywords

  • Abdominal surgery
  • General surgery
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bladeless trocar versus traditional trocar for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this