Can nasal surgery improve obstructive sleep apnea: Subjective or objective?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: This study assessed changes in sleep-related symptoms and polysomnographic parameters after nasal surgery for nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) adults in Taiwan. Methods: A total of 66 patients with OSA and chronic nasal obstruction were recruited (surgical, n = 44; control, n = 22). Nasal surgery alone was the treatment in surgical patients. Outcomes were measured in a Snore Outcome Survey (SOS), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), rhinomanometry, and polysomnographic parameters at baseline and again after 3 months. Results: Significantly improved nasal resistance as measured by the SOS and ESS were found only in the surgical group (all, p < 0.001). Both groups revealed insignificant changes in polysomnographic parameters. The patients with lower body weight index, less daytime sleepiness, and lower tongue position had a better success rate than the others (50% versus 3%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although nasal surgery relieved snoring and daytime sleepiness, it had variable effects on polysomnographic parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e51-e55
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Epworth sleepiness scale
  • Friedman tongue position
  • Nasal resistance
  • Nasal surgery
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • Polysomnography
  • Snore outcome survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can nasal surgery improve obstructive sleep apnea: Subjective or objective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this