Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Carbapenem susceptibilities and non-susceptibility concordance to different carbapenems amongst clinically important Gram-negative bacteria isolated from intensive care units in Taiwan: Results from the Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2009

  • Shio Shin Jean
  • , Po Ren Hsueh*
  • , Wen Sen Lee
  • , Kwok Woon Yu
  • , Chun Hsing Liao
  • , Feng Yi Chang
  • , Wen Chien Ko
  • , Jiunn Jong Wu
  • , Yen Hsu Chen
  • , Yao Shen Chen
  • , Jien Wei Liu
  • , Min Chi Lu
  • , Cheng Yi Liu
  • , Carlos Lam
  • , Ray Jade Chen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Taipei Medical University
  • National Taiwan University
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
  • Triservice General Hospital Taiwan
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Kaohsiung Medical University
  • Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung Taiwan
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chung Shan Medical and Dental University
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

To investigate the in vitro susceptibilities to various carbapenems amongst clinical Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients in intensive care units of ten major teaching hospitals in Taiwan in 2009, a survey was conducted to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem and doripenem against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 594), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 185), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 192) and Burkholderia cepacia (n = 23) using the agar dilution method. Susceptibilities were determined according to 2009, 2011 and 2012 MIC breakpoints recommended by the CLSI as well as 2012 MIC breakpoints recommended by EUCAST. Based on CLSI 2012 criteria, the ertapenem susceptible rate was 93%, 81%, 68% and 92% for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae and Serratia marcescens, respectively. All Proteus mirabilis and Morganella morganii isolates were susceptible to ertapenem; however, 64% of P. mirabilis and all M. morganii isolates were non-susceptible to imipenem. Meropenem and doripenem had better activities than imipenem against ertapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates. E. coli, K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae with ertapenem MICs ≥ 4 mg/L were synchronously not susceptible to imipenem, meropenem and doripenem. Imipenem susceptibility was 65% and 29% for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, respectively. Additionally, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates with imipenem MICs ≥ 8 mg/L were also not susceptible to meropenem and doripenem. These data provide a better understanding of choosing appropriate carbapenem agents to treat infections caused by ertapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae as well as P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates with imipenem MICs ≥ 4 mg/L.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-462
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 05 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acinetobacter baumannii
  • Carbapenem
  • Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  • Enterobacteriaceae
  • Non-susceptibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carbapenem susceptibilities and non-susceptibility concordance to different carbapenems amongst clinically important Gram-negative bacteria isolated from intensive care units in Taiwan: Results from the Surveillance of Multicentre Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART) in 2009'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this