Abstract
Background: This study investigated whether removal of a percutaneously inserted central venous catheter (PICC) is compulsory in neonates with bloodstream infection (BSI), and also examined the risk factors for infectious complications when a PICC is retained in these patients. Methods: This was a cohort study of neonates with a PICC who developed a BSI between 2001 and 2007. BSI was defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Results: Of the 234 neonates in the cohort, 99 had early removal of PICC (ER-PICC, defined as removal within 3 days after the onset of clinical sepsis), and 135 had late removal of PICC (LR-PICC, defined as retention for more than 3 days after the onset of clinical sepsis). Resolution of clinical sepsis within 2 days was more frequent in the ER-PICC group compared with the LR-PICC group (80.8% vs 57.8%; P <.001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of infectious complications and case fatalities, but the LR-PICC group had a significantly higher incidence of recurrence within 1 month after BSI (P =.002). Inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment was the only variable independently associated with infectious complications (odds ratio, 11.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.34∼39.2; P <.001). Conclusions: PICCs should be removed in neonates with BSI, because retention of PICCs for more than 3 days is associated with delayed resolution of clinical sepsis and a higher incidence of recurrence within 1 month.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 59-64 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | American Journal of Infection Control |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 02 2012 |
Keywords
- Catheter-related sepsis
- Early removal
- Late removal
- Percutaneously inserted central venous catheter
- Recurrence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Catheter management in neonates with bloodstream infection and a percutaneously inserted central venous catheter in situ: Removal or not?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver