Cervical electromyographic activities during neck movements at different speeds in healthy subjects: Voluntary response index analysis

Chih Hsiu Cheng, Kwan Hwa Lin, Jiu Jenq Lin, Jaw Lin Wang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The assessment of cervical muscle control patterns is important for the diagnosis of cervical dysfunction. Voluntary response index (VRI), including the similarity index (SI) and the magnitude (MAG), provides quantitative analysis of the surface electromyography (sEMG) pattern and total muscle voluntary activities respectively. This study was to investigate the effect of movement directions and speeds of the VRI response of cervical muscles in healthy subjects. The sEMG of bilateral sternocleidomastoid, semispinalis capitis, and splenius capitis were measured in thirteen asymptomatic young subjects. The subjects performed voluntary neck movements in flexion, extension, left and right side bending at fast, medium, and slow speeds. The results showed that SI ranged from 1-0.8 and MAG was generally less than 40 μV. The SI was significantly smallest and the MAG was largest at fast speed. The MAG was also significantly different among directions but the effect of direction on SI was only significant at fast speed. In conclusion, the movement speed and direction could affect the magnitude and control pattern of cervical muscles, such that both the speed and direction of the examined tasks should be carefully monitored during the assessment of cervical muscle activation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-357
Number of pages9
JournalBiomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Electromyography
  • Neck motion
  • VRI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical electromyographic activities during neck movements at different speeds in healthy subjects: Voluntary response index analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this