Challenges of feedback provision in the workplace: A qualitative study of emergency medicine residents and teachers

Chung Hsien Chaou, Lynn V. Monrouxe, Li Chun Chang, Shiuan Ruey Yu, Chip Jin Ng, Ching Hsing Lee, Yu Che Chang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Feedback is an effective pedagogical tool in clinical teaching and learning, but is often perceived as unsatisfactory. Little is known about the effect of a busy clinical environment on feedback-giving and -seeking behaviors. This study aims to determine the perceptions and challenges of feedback provision in a busy clinical setting, exemplified by an emergency department (ED). Methods: A qualitative semi-structured interview study design was employed. Thirty-six participants (18 attending physicians, 18 residents) were purposively sampled from three EDs in northern Taiwan between August 2015 and July 2016. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Results: Three major themes were identified with illustrative quotes: (1) the balance between patient safety and providing feedback, (2) variability in feedback, and (3) influential factors, barriers and enablers. Conclusions: In real practice, clinical duties competed with the impulse to provide feedback. The variety and complexity of feedback extended beyond style and content. Clinical and contextual factors–some of which may be presented as barriers–influenced how, when and whether a teacher or learner decided to give or seek feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1145-1153
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume39
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 02 11 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges of feedback provision in the workplace: A qualitative study of emergency medicine residents and teachers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this