Chromosome distribution of early miscarriages with present or absent embryos: Female predominance

Hsin Hsin Cheng, Chia Yu Ou, Ching Chang Tsai, Shuenn Dyh Chang, Pi Yu Hsiao, Kuo Chung Lan*, Te Yao Hsu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to compare the chromosomal distribution of early miscarriages with or without embryonic poles. Materials and methods: It was a retrospective study of 223 women who underwent dilation and curettage (D&C) between 1995 and 2013 for early miscarriages. The presence or absence of a fetal pole was evaluated by abdominal or transvaginal ultrasound. Cytogenetic tests of products of conception following culture were determined in both groups. Results: Of the 223 early miscarriages, 143 had embryos and 80 did not. The abnormality rate differed significantly (61.5 % vs. 46.3 %, p < 0.05), with trisomy 18, 21 and 45X found only in miscarriages with embryos. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of triploidy, tetraploidy, mosaicism, structure and double abnormality. The female abortus rate was higher in miscarriages with or without embryonic poles, as well as in groups with normal and abnormal karyotypes. Conclusions: Chromosome distribution differs in miscarriages with or without embryonic poles. The ultrasound findings might offer different direction to determine the causes of early miscarriages. The higher female abortus rate may be associated with early selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1059-1064
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anembryonic pregnancy
  • Blighted ovum
  • Chromosome anomaly
  • Miscarriages
  • Missed abortion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chromosome distribution of early miscarriages with present or absent embryos: Female predominance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this