Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical research in ovarian cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup

  • participants of the 6th Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research
  • Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG)
  • KU Leuven
  • Grupo Español de Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO)
  • University of Navarra
  • Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO)
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS
  • Cancer Research UK
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trial Unit (NSGO-CTU)
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Groupe d'Investigateurs National des Etudes des Cancers Ovariens et du Sein (GINECO)
  • Strasbourg Cancer Institute
  • Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG)
  • The Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Gynecologic Oncology Group-Foundation (GOG-F)
  • Oklahoma City
  • University of Liege
  • The Institute of Cancer Research
  • Imperial College London
  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group
  • University of Marburg
  • Association de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Women's Cancer Research Network-Cooperative Gynecologic Oncology Investigators (WCRN-COGI)
  • Stanford University
  • Asia Pacific Gynecologic Oncology Trials Group (APGOT)
  • Gynecologic Cancer Group Singapore (GCGS)
  • National University of Singapore
  • IRCCS Istituto di ricerche farmacologiche Mario Negri - Milano, Bergamo, Ranica
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group (SGOG)
  • Fudan University
  • AGO -Austria
  • Innsbruck Medical University
  • Cancer Trials Ireland
  • St James's Hospital
  • Global Gynecologic Oncology Consortium (G-GOC)
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Hospital Quironsalud Valencia
  • Gynecologic Cancer Clinical Trials and Investigation Consortium (GOTIC)
  • Saitama Medical University
  • Canadian Cancer Trials Group
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Toronto
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Unknown

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

117 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) sixth Ovarian Cancer Conference on Clinical Research was held virtually in October, 2021, following published consensus guidelines. The goal of the consensus meeting was to achieve harmonisation on the design elements of upcoming trials in ovarian cancer, to select important questions for future study, and to identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and adoption of 20 statements within four topic groups on clinical research in ovarian cancer including first line treatment, recurrent disease, disease subgroups, and future trials. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 14 of 20 statements, with greater than 90% concordance in the remaining six statements. The high acceptance rate following active deliberation among the GCIG groups confirmed that a consensus process could be applied in a virtual setting. Together with detailed categorisation of unmet needs, these consensus statements will promote the harmonisation of international clinical research in ovarian cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e374-e384
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical research in ovarian cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this