TY - JOUR
T1 - Combination of computed tomography angiography with coronary artery calcium score for improved diagnosis of coronary artery disease
T2 - a collaborative meta-analysis of stable chest pain patients referred for invasive coronary angiography
AU - COME-CCT
AU - Mohamed, Mahmoud
AU - Bosserdt, Maria
AU - Wieske, Viktoria
AU - Dubourg, Benjamin
AU - Alkadhi, Hatem
AU - Garcia, Mario J.
AU - Leschka, Sebastian
AU - Zimmermann, Elke
AU - Shabestari, Abbas A.
AU - Nørgaard, Bjarne L.
AU - Meijs, Matthijs F.L.
AU - Øvrehus, Kristian A.
AU - Diederichsen, Axel C.P.
AU - Knuuti, Juhani
AU - Halvorsen, Bjørn A.
AU - Mendoza-Rodriguez, Vladymir
AU - Wan, Yung Liang
AU - Bettencourt, Nuno
AU - Martuscelli, Eugenio
AU - Buechel, Ronny R.
AU - Mickley, Hans
AU - Sun, Kai
AU - Muraglia, Simone
AU - Kaufmann, Philipp A.
AU - Herzog, Bernhard A.
AU - Tardif, Jean Claude
AU - Schütz, Georg M.
AU - Laule, Michael
AU - Newby, David E.
AU - Achenbach, Stephan
AU - Budoff, Matthew
AU - Haase, Robert
AU - Biavati, Federico
AU - Mézquita, Aldo Vásquez
AU - Schlattmann, Peter
AU - Dewey, Marc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has higher diagnostic accuracy than coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain, while the added diagnostic value of combining CCTA with CAC is unknown. We investigated whether combining coronary CCTA with CAC score can improve the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA alone.METHODS: A total of 2315 patients (858 women, 37%) aged 61.1 ± 10.2 from 29 original studies were included to build two CAD prediction models based on either CCTA alone or CCTA combined with the CAC score. CAD was defined as at least 50% coronary diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. Models were built by using generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept set for the original study. The two CAD prediction models were compared by the likelihood ratio test, while their diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Net benefit (benefit of true positive versus harm of false positive) was assessed by decision curve analysis.RESULTS: CAD prevalence was 43.5% (1007/2315). Combining CCTA with CAC improved CAD diagnosis compared with CCTA alone (AUC: 87% [95% CI: 86 to 89%] vs. 80% [95% CI: 78 to 82%]; p < 0.001), likelihood ratio test 236.3, df: 1, p < 0.001, showing a higher net benefit across almost all threshold probabilities.CONCLUSION: Adding the CAC score to CCTA findings in patients with stable chest pain improves the diagnostic performance in detecting CAD and the net benefit compared with CCTA alone.CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CAC scoring CT performed before coronary CTA and included in the diagnostic model can improve obstructive CAD diagnosis, especially when CCTA is non-diagnostic.KEY POINTS: • The combination of coronary artery calcium with coronary computed tomography angiography showed significantly higher AUC (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 86 to 89%) for diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to coronary computed tomography angiography alone (80%, 95% CI: 78 to 82%, p < 0.001). • Diagnostic improvement was mostly seen in patients with non-diagnostic C. • The improvement in diagnostic performance and the net benefit was consistent across age groups, chest pain types, and genders.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has higher diagnostic accuracy than coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain, while the added diagnostic value of combining CCTA with CAC is unknown. We investigated whether combining coronary CCTA with CAC score can improve the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA alone.METHODS: A total of 2315 patients (858 women, 37%) aged 61.1 ± 10.2 from 29 original studies were included to build two CAD prediction models based on either CCTA alone or CCTA combined with the CAC score. CAD was defined as at least 50% coronary diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. Models were built by using generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept set for the original study. The two CAD prediction models were compared by the likelihood ratio test, while their diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Net benefit (benefit of true positive versus harm of false positive) was assessed by decision curve analysis.RESULTS: CAD prevalence was 43.5% (1007/2315). Combining CCTA with CAC improved CAD diagnosis compared with CCTA alone (AUC: 87% [95% CI: 86 to 89%] vs. 80% [95% CI: 78 to 82%]; p < 0.001), likelihood ratio test 236.3, df: 1, p < 0.001, showing a higher net benefit across almost all threshold probabilities.CONCLUSION: Adding the CAC score to CCTA findings in patients with stable chest pain improves the diagnostic performance in detecting CAD and the net benefit compared with CCTA alone.CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CAC scoring CT performed before coronary CTA and included in the diagnostic model can improve obstructive CAD diagnosis, especially when CCTA is non-diagnostic.KEY POINTS: • The combination of coronary artery calcium with coronary computed tomography angiography showed significantly higher AUC (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 86 to 89%) for diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to coronary computed tomography angiography alone (80%, 95% CI: 78 to 82%, p < 0.001). • Diagnostic improvement was mostly seen in patients with non-diagnostic C. • The improvement in diagnostic performance and the net benefit was consistent across age groups, chest pain types, and genders.
KW - Aged
KW - Calcium
KW - Chest Pain/diagnosis
KW - Computed Tomography Angiography/methods
KW - Coronary Angiography/methods
KW - Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
KW - Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174006944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-023-10223-z
DO - 10.1007/s00330-023-10223-z
M3 - 文章
C2 - 37831139
AN - SCOPUS:85174006944
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 34
SP - 2426
EP - 2436
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 4
ER -