Comments on “Availability of k-Coterie“

Shyan Ming Yuan; Her Kun Chang

doi:10.1109/12.338112

Comments on “Availability of k-Coterie“

Shyan Ming Yuan
, Her Kun Chang

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Kakugawa et al. proposed the k-majority coterie for the distributed k-mutual exclusion problem (k-mutex). It was claimed that the k-majority coterie is a k-coterie, which is a general solution for k-mutex. In this comment, we show that the k-majority coterie is not necessary a k-coterie.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1457
Number of pages	1
Journal	IEEE Transactions on Computers
Volume	43
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/12.338112
State	Published - 12 1994
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Coterie
distributed system
mutual exclusion

Access to Document

10.1109/12.338112

Cite this

@article{a51da3c753de4c81b182bfee61bcef0f,

title = "Comments on {\textquotedblleft}Availability of k-Coterie{\textquotedblleft}",

abstract = "Kakugawa et al. proposed the k-majority coterie for the distributed k-mutual exclusion problem (k-mutex). It was claimed that the k-majority coterie is a k-coterie, which is a general solution for k-mutex. In this comment, we show that the k-majority coterie is not necessary a k-coterie.",

keywords = "Coterie, distributed system, mutual exclusion",

author = "Yuan, \{Shyan Ming\} and Chang, \{Her Kun\}",

year = "1994",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1109/12.338112",

language = "英语",

volume = "43",

pages = "1457",

journal = "IEEE Transactions on Computers",

issn = "0018-9340",

publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on “Availability of k-Coterie“

AU - Yuan, Shyan Ming

AU - Chang, Her Kun

PY - 1994/12

Y1 - 1994/12

N2 - Kakugawa et al. proposed the k-majority coterie for the distributed k-mutual exclusion problem (k-mutex). It was claimed that the k-majority coterie is a k-coterie, which is a general solution for k-mutex. In this comment, we show that the k-majority coterie is not necessary a k-coterie.

AB - Kakugawa et al. proposed the k-majority coterie for the distributed k-mutual exclusion problem (k-mutex). It was claimed that the k-majority coterie is a k-coterie, which is a general solution for k-mutex. In this comment, we show that the k-majority coterie is not necessary a k-coterie.

KW - Coterie

KW - distributed system

KW - mutual exclusion

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0000820224

U2 - 10.1109/12.338112

DO - 10.1109/12.338112

M3 - 评论/辩论

AN - SCOPUS:0000820224

SN - 0018-9340

VL - 43

SP - 1457

JO - IEEE Transactions on Computers

JF - IEEE Transactions on Computers

IS - 12

ER -

Comments on “Availability of k-Coterie“

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this