Comparative analysis of sleep physiology using qualitative and quantitative criteria for insomnia symptoms

  • Ruda Lee*
  • , Olivia Larson
  • , Sammy Dhaliwal
  • , Kibum Moon
  • , Bethany Gerardy
  • , Philip de Chazal
  • , Peter A. Cistulli
  • , Ning Hung Chen
  • , Fang Han
  • , Qing Yun Li
  • , Greg Maislin
  • , Nigel McArdle
  • , Thomas Penzel
  • , Richard J. Schwab
  • , Sergio Tufik
  • , Ulysses J. Magalang
  • , Bhajan Singh
  • , Thorarinn Gislason
  • , Allan I. Pack
  • , Brendan T. Keenan
  • Magdy Younes, Philip Gehrman
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite decades of research, defining insomnia remains challenging due to its complex and variable nature. Various diagnostic systems emphasize the chronic nature of insomnia and its impact on daily functioning, relying heavily on patient self-reporting due to limitations in objective measures such as polysomnography (PSG). Discrepancies between subjective experiences and objective PSG results highlight the need for more nuanced approaches, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral analysis, which reveals distinct patterns of high-frequency activity in individuals with insomnia. This study explores EEG markers of insomnia by integrating subjective reports with objective physiological markers, specifically ORP (Odds-Ratio-Product) and spectral features, to address inconsistencies found in previous research and clinical settings. Qualitative and quantitative definitions of insomnia are contrasted to highlight differences in sleep architecture and EEG characteristics. The research aims to determine whether groups defined by weekly frequency and daily duration of symptoms have different distribution patterns and which physiological characteristics best distinguish insomnia patients from controls. Our findings suggest that ORP, as a dependent variable, captures the most significant differences in the independent variables across the model. Elevated beta power in insomnia patients indicates increased cortical arousal, supporting the perspective of insomnia as a hyperarousal disorder. Future research should focus on using ORP to enhance the understanding of sleep disturbances in insomnia. Comprehensive evaluation of insomnia requires integrating qualitative, quantitative, and neurophysiological data to fully understand its impact on sleep architecture and quality.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberzsae301
JournalSleep
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 03 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].

Keywords

  • EEG spectral analysis
  • hyperarousal
  • insomnia
  • odds-ratio-product (ORP)
  • sleep architecture
  • sleep/wake physiology
  • Electroencephalography/methods
  • Humans
  • Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Polysomnography/methods
  • Sleep/physiology
  • Female
  • Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of sleep physiology using qualitative and quantitative criteria for insomnia symptoms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this