Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke

Chung Shan Hung; Yu Wei Hsieh; Ching Yi Wu; Keh Chung Lin; Jui Chi Lin; Li Min Yeh; Hsin Pei Yin

doi:10.5014/ajot.2019.022368

Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke

Chung Shan Hung, Yu Wei Hsieh, Ching Yi Wu, Keh Chung Lin, Jui Chi Lin, Li Min Yeh, Hsin Pei Yin

Department of Occupational Therapy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We investigated the effects on motor and daily function of robot-assisted therapies in people with chronic stroke using the Bi-Manu-Track (BMT) and InMotion 3.0 (IMT) compared with control treatment (CT). METHOD. In this comparative efficacy trial, 30 participants were randomized to receive BMT, IMT, or CT. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. RESULTS. The IMT group improved more in FMA and proximal MAS scores than the BMT group (both ps < .01) and the CT group (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The IMT and BMT groups showed clinically relevant improvements after treatment on the MRC rather than the MAL. CONCLUSION. The results indicate that the IMT might improve motor function. The IMT and BMT groups showed similar benefits for muscle power but limited improvements in self-perceived use of the affected arm.

Original language	English
Article number	7301205010
Journal	The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
Volume	73
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.022368
State	Published - 02 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Access to Document

10.5014/ajot.2019.022368

Cite this

Hung, C. S., Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Lin, J. C., Yeh, L. M., & Yin, H. P. (2019). Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke. The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 73(1), Article 7301205010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.022368

@article{b2cb456a155d42b38222776b7fe9f2ea,

title = "Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE. We investigated the effects on motor and daily function of robot-assisted therapies in people with chronic stroke using the Bi-Manu-Track (BMT) and InMotion 3.0 (IMT) compared with control treatment (CT). METHOD. In this comparative efficacy trial, 30 participants were randomized to receive BMT, IMT, or CT. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. RESULTS. The IMT group improved more in FMA and proximal MAS scores than the BMT group (both ps < .01) and the CT group (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The IMT and BMT groups showed clinically relevant improvements after treatment on the MRC rather than the MAL. CONCLUSION. The results indicate that the IMT might improve motor function. The IMT and BMT groups showed similar benefits for muscle power but limited improvements in self-perceived use of the affected arm.",

author = "Hung, {Chung Shan} and Hsieh, {Yu Wei} and Wu, {Ching Yi} and Lin, {Keh Chung} and Lin, {Jui Chi} and Yeh, {Li Min} and Yin, {Hsin Pei}",

year = "2019",

month = feb,

doi = "10.5014/ajot.2019.022368",

language = "英语",

volume = "73",

journal = "The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association",

issn = "0272-9490",

publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",

number = "1",

}

Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke. / Hung, Chung Shan; Hsieh, Yu Wei ; Wu, Ching Yi et al.
In: The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Vol. 73, No. 1, 7301205010, 02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke

AU - Hung, Chung Shan

AU - Hsieh, Yu Wei

AU - Wu, Ching Yi

AU - Lin, Keh Chung

AU - Lin, Jui Chi

AU - Yeh, Li Min

AU - Yin, Hsin Pei

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE. We investigated the effects on motor and daily function of robot-assisted therapies in people with chronic stroke using the Bi-Manu-Track (BMT) and InMotion 3.0 (IMT) compared with control treatment (CT). METHOD. In this comparative efficacy trial, 30 participants were randomized to receive BMT, IMT, or CT. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. RESULTS. The IMT group improved more in FMA and proximal MAS scores than the BMT group (both ps < .01) and the CT group (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The IMT and BMT groups showed clinically relevant improvements after treatment on the MRC rather than the MAL. CONCLUSION. The results indicate that the IMT might improve motor function. The IMT and BMT groups showed similar benefits for muscle power but limited improvements in self-perceived use of the affected arm.

AB - OBJECTIVE. We investigated the effects on motor and daily function of robot-assisted therapies in people with chronic stroke using the Bi-Manu-Track (BMT) and InMotion 3.0 (IMT) compared with control treatment (CT). METHOD. In this comparative efficacy trial, 30 participants were randomized to receive BMT, IMT, or CT. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. RESULTS. The IMT group improved more in FMA and proximal MAS scores than the BMT group (both ps < .01) and the CT group (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The IMT and BMT groups showed clinically relevant improvements after treatment on the MRC rather than the MAL. CONCLUSION. The results indicate that the IMT might improve motor function. The IMT and BMT groups showed similar benefits for muscle power but limited improvements in self-perceived use of the affected arm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062596055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2019.022368

DO - 10.5014/ajot.2019.022368

M3 - 文章

C2 - 30839256

AN - SCOPUS:85062596055

SN - 0272-9490

VL - 73

JO - The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association

JF - The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association

IS - 1

M1 - 7301205010

ER -

Comparative Assessment of Two Robot-Assisted Therapies for the Upper Extremity in PeopleWith Chronic Stroke

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this