Abstract
This retrospective multi-institutional database analysis aimed to evaluate the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and clinical outcomes of a generic versus brand-name nifedipine for hypertension management. A total of 12 693 patients who were prescribed a generic or brand-name nifedipine between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018, were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database of Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals, Taiwan. Among them, 2112 (21.4%) were prescribed generic nifedipine. After propensity score matching, both the generic and brand-name groups consisted of 2102 patients. At a mean follow-up of 3 years, the changes in office systolic (p for interaction =.791) and diastolic blood pressure (p for interaction =.689) did not differ significantly between the patients who received the generic and the brand-name nifedipine. There was no significant difference between the two study groups regarding the composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.85–1.13; p =.774). In conclusion, the generic nifedipine was comparable to its brand-name counterpart regarding office blood pressure reduction and the composite cardiovascular outcome for the treatment of patients with hypertension.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 621-629 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Hypertension |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 05 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Keywords
- blood pressure
- generic drug
- nifedipine
- outcome