Abstract
This study compares the design processes of designers in both digital and traditional sketching environments, where the digital environment emulates the traditional face-to-face, pen-and-paper environment. The design processes were empirically examined through protocol analysis using a coding scheme based on the function-behaviour-structure ontology. The distributions of the different types of segments, and their transitions in the two environments were quantitatively compared using Chi-Square tests and Paired-T tests. The results indicate that the design processes in the two environments were not statistically different in terms of their distributions and transitions. The higher-level cognitive activities were not affected by the change of medium. Some implications for design computing and design practice are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-29 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Design Studies |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 01 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Collaborative design
- Computer-aided design
- Drawings
- Function-behaviour-structure
- Protocol analysis