Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison between carotid duplex sonography and angiography in the diagnosis of extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion.

  • T. H. Lee*
  • , S. J. Ryu
  • , S. T. Chen
  • , K. J. Tseng
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion by carotid duplex sonography and ophthalmic flow direction, we compared both carotid sonograms and angiograms in 82 cases of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. A total of 157 carotid arteries were available for comparison. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ICA occlusion by duplex scanning was 96% (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 91%), by ophthalmic flow examination, 95% (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value 86%), and by combined study, 98% (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value 92%). We recommend that the ophthalmic flow examination should be used in combination with other sonographic methods in detecting extracranial carotid artery disease. The combined study gives higher diagnostic accuracy than the single method. When an occlusion or a tight stenosis is uncertain on carotid sonograms, color Doppler or angiography is indicated for further confirmation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-579
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Formosan Medical Association
Volume91
Issue number6
StatePublished - 06 1992
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between carotid duplex sonography and angiography in the diagnosis of extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this