TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between the Trachway video intubating stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope in four simulated difficult tracheal intubations
T2 - A manikin study
AU - Ong, Jimmy
AU - Lee, Chia Ling
AU - Huang, Shen Jer
AU - Shyr, Ming Hwang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Objectives It remains to be determined whether the TVI-4000 Trachway video intubating (TVI) stylet (Markstein Sichtec Medical Corp, Taichung, Taiwan), an airway device for novices, improves airway management practice by experienced anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the TVI stylet in difficult tracheal intubation situations compared with that of using the Macintosh laryngoscope on an airway manikin. Materials and Methods Ten anesthesiologists (with 3–21 years’ experience), including three senior residents, participated. We compared tracheal intubation in four airway scenarios: normal airway, tongue edema, cervical spine immobilization, and tongue edema combined with cervical spine immobilization. The time of tracheal intubation (TTI), success rate, and perceived difficulty of intubation for each scenario were compared and analyzed. Results The TTI was significantly shorter in both the tongue edema and combined scenarios with the TVI stylet compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope (21.60 ± 1.45 seconds vs. 24.07 ± 1.58 seconds and 23.73 ± 2.05 seconds vs. 26.6 ± 2.77 seconds, respectively). Success rates for both devices were 100%. Concomitantly, participants rated using the TVI stylet in these two scenarios as being less difficult. Conclusion The learning time for tracheal intubation using the TVI stylet in difficult airway scenarios was short. Use of the TVI stylet was easier and required a shorter TTI for tracheal intubation in the tongue edema and combined scenarios.
AB - Objectives It remains to be determined whether the TVI-4000 Trachway video intubating (TVI) stylet (Markstein Sichtec Medical Corp, Taichung, Taiwan), an airway device for novices, improves airway management practice by experienced anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the TVI stylet in difficult tracheal intubation situations compared with that of using the Macintosh laryngoscope on an airway manikin. Materials and Methods Ten anesthesiologists (with 3–21 years’ experience), including three senior residents, participated. We compared tracheal intubation in four airway scenarios: normal airway, tongue edema, cervical spine immobilization, and tongue edema combined with cervical spine immobilization. The time of tracheal intubation (TTI), success rate, and perceived difficulty of intubation for each scenario were compared and analyzed. Results The TTI was significantly shorter in both the tongue edema and combined scenarios with the TVI stylet compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope (21.60 ± 1.45 seconds vs. 24.07 ± 1.58 seconds and 23.73 ± 2.05 seconds vs. 26.6 ± 2.77 seconds, respectively). Success rates for both devices were 100%. Concomitantly, participants rated using the TVI stylet in these two scenarios as being less difficult. Conclusion The learning time for tracheal intubation using the TVI stylet in difficult airway scenarios was short. Use of the TVI stylet was easier and required a shorter TTI for tracheal intubation in the tongue edema and combined scenarios.
KW - Adult learning
KW - Difficult intubation
KW - Medical simulation
KW - Video laryngoscope
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990875233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.06.004
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84990875233
SN - 1016-3190
VL - 28
SP - 109
EP - 112
JO - Tzu Chi Medical Journal
JF - Tzu Chi Medical Journal
IS - 3
ER -