Comparison of adjustable and nonadjustable single-incision mini-slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: An initial experience with 30 cases

Objective: Several single-incision mini-slings (SIMSs) have been developed to minimize the potential complications associated with retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings. However, few studies compared the efficacy of different types of SIMS. This study compared the outcomes of an adjustable SIMS (Ajust) with a nonadjustable SIMS (Solyx) in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) over postoperative follow-up of 12 months. Materials and methods: In this study, the surgical outcomes of the first 30 patients receiving Ajust and the first 30 patients undergoing Solyx at a university hospital were reviewed retrospectively, all of whom were diagnosed with USI without coexistent pelvic organ prolapse. Preoperative and postoperative examinations included structured urogynecological questionnaires, 1-hour pad tests, and complete urodynamic testing. Patient demographics, urodynamic parameters, and 12-months surgical outcomes were compared between the Ajust and Solyx groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the Ajust and Solyx groups in terms of subjective cure rate (93.3% vs 90.0%), objective cure rate (89.3% vs 89.3%), and de novo urgency or urge urinary incontinence (13.3% vs 16.7%) 12 months after surgery. Postoperatively, both Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores were significantly improved in the Ajust and Solyx groups. In comparison with preoperative data, postoperative urodynamic results revealed a significant decrease in maximal urethral closure pressure in the Ajust group (n = 28) and a significant increase in residual urine in the Solyx group (n = 28). However, significant differences were not observed in the postoperative pad test and urodynamic data between the Ajust and Solyx groups, and no major complications occurred in either group. Conclusions: In this paper describing the preliminary experience of 30 patients, both adjustable and nonadjustable SIMS performed by an experienced surgeon were safe and effective in correcting USI at 12-month postoperative follow-up.