Comparison of Clinical Outcome in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty by Conventional Anterolateral Transgluteal or 2-Incision Approach

Dave Weichih Chen*, Chih Chien Hu, Yu Han Chang, Wen E. Yang, Mel S. Lee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Studies comparing the minimally invasive surgery with 2-incision technique (MIS-2) technique with the conventional transgluteal technique are lacking in the literatures. We compared the clinical outcomes in a series of 166 hips, including 83 MIS-2 total hip arthroplsty (THA) (group I) and another 83 matched-pair series (group II) using conventional transgluteal approach. Demographic data, hospital course, radiographic data, and functional outcome (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Harris hip score [HHS]) were investigated. The 2 groups significantly differed in 3 and 6-month HHS with a higher HHS in MIS-2 group. But the MIS-2 group had longer operation time, increased blood loss, and more complications. The current study indicates that the benefit of MIS-2 technique was only short-term with quicker functional recovery and shorter duration use of nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs postoperatively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)528-532
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 06 2009

Keywords

  • MIS-2 THA
  • conventional anterolateral transgluteal THA, retrospective study, short-term result
  • minimal invasive 2-incision THA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Clinical Outcome in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty by Conventional Anterolateral Transgluteal or 2-Incision Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this