Comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft of primary versus secondary palate

  • Yu Fang Liao
  • , Chiung Shing Huang*
  • , M. Samuel Noordhoff
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To identify and compare the craniofacial morphology of patients with bilateral complete cleft of primary palate (BCCPP) and bilateral complete cleft of secondary palate (BCCSP). In addition, to evaluate the differential effects of lip repair and palatal repair on the craniofacial morphology in cleft patients. Subjects: Twenty-four children, 10 boys and 14 girls, mean age of 5.8 years, with BCCPP (BCCPP group). Twenty-five children, 10 boys and 15 girls, mean age of 5.6 years, with BCCSP (BCCSP group). Design: Retrospective analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Cephalometric analysis was used to determine the craniofacial morphology at about 5 years of age. Results: Compared with the BCCSP group, the BCCPP group demonstrated longer maxillary length, more protruded maxilla, more favorable jaw relation, more severely retroclined maxillary incisors, and larger overjet. Conclusions: The subjects with BCCPP had craniofacial characteristics that differed significantly from those with BCCSP. It could also be speculated that palatal repair had more adverse effect on the growth of the maxilla in length; however, that repair influenced less the anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors than lip repair did.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-356
Number of pages4
JournalThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cephalometry
  • Lip repair
  • Palatal repair

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft of primary versus secondary palate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this