Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of hook plate alone, hook plate augmented with suture anchor, and arthroscopically-assisted tightrope fixation in the treatment of patients with acute type v acromioclavicular joint dislocations

  • Huan Sheu
  • , Chun Jui Weng
  • , Hao Che Tang
  • , Cheng Pang Yang
  • , Kuo Yao Hsu
  • , Yi Sheng Chan
  • , Alvin Chao-Yu Chen
  • , Joe Chih-Hao Chiu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The best treatment for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS: Hook plate augmented with suture anchor (HA) may have different clinical and radiological results than hook plate alone (H), and arthroscopically assisted TightRope (TR) techniques in treating acute type V AC joint dislocations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 71 patients with acute type V AC joint dislocations between December 2010 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: H group (n=22), HA group (n=23) and TR group (n=26). We measured the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) differences and CCD ratio compared to uninjured side pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, at 3-month and 2-year after operation. Clinical outcomes were assessed as well at the same time points. Loss of correction was determined by the CCD difference and ratio between surgical and uninjured sides.

RESULTS: The mean age and follow-up period were 41.8±24.7 years and 30.2±4.3 months, respectively. No significant differences were found in the demographic data between the three groups. The HA group presented a trend of less overcorrection but without significance compared with the H group at immediately post-operation, 3-month, and 2-year follow-up. (CCD difference: -2.4mm vs. -3.7mm, -1.6mm vs. -1.8, and 0.2mm vs -1.9mm, CCD ratio: 67.7% vs. 40.9%, 79.3% vs. 70.1%, and 100.6% vs. 86.5%, respectively). The HA group also had significantly less loss of correction compared with the TR group at 3-month and 2-year after the operation (CCD difference: -1.6mm vs. 1.6mm, 0.2mm vs. 2.4mm; CCD ratio: 79.3% vs. 122.2%, 100.6% vs. 136.1%, all p<0.05). All three methods achieved significant improvement in function and pain without inter-group differences. No coracoid-related or tunnel complications occurred.

DISCUSSION: The hook plate alone, and hook plate with suture anchor augmentation techniques provided less residual vertical instability compared to TightRope fixation at 2-year follow-up. The patient-reported functional outcomes were promising and comparable among the three groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103494
Pages (from-to)103494
JournalOrthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research
Volume109
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 06 2023

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Acromioclavicular joint dislocation
  • Arthroscopically assisted TightRope fixation
  • Hook plate
  • Hook plate augmented with suture anchor
  • Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging
  • Suture Anchors
  • Acromioclavicular Joint/diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Bone Plates
  • Shoulder Dislocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of hook plate alone, hook plate augmented with suture anchor, and arthroscopically-assisted tightrope fixation in the treatment of patients with acute type v acromioclavicular joint dislocations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this