Comparison of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles

  • Yu Che Ou
  • , Kuo Chung Lan*
  • , Fu Jen Huang
  • , Fu Tsai Kung
  • , Ting Hsun Lan
  • , Shiuh Young Chang
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles. Design: Case-control study. Setting: An IVF laboratory in a university hospital in Taiwan. Patient(s): Between January 2003 and December 2007, infertile couples with one, two, or three oocytes per retrieval were divided into two groups: 56 IVF cycles based on 28 demographic characteristics from the ICSI group. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Fertilization rate, cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and implantation rate per transfer. Result(s): The normal fertilization rate was significantly higher after ICSI than after standard IVF (86.4% vs. 69.3%). The cycle cancellation and complete fertilization failure rates were comparable between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (38.5% vs. 21.6%), implantation rate (23.5% vs. 11.1%), and live birth rate per transfer (30.8% vs. 13.7%) had a favorable trend, but no statistically significant differences, in the ICSI group compared with the IVF group. Conclusion(s): A higher normal fertilization rate can be achieved by ICSI in comparison with conventional IVF in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 01 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ICSI
  • IVF
  • oocyte number
  • poor responder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this