Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comprehensive and subacute care interventions improve health-related quality of life for older patients after surgery for hip fracture: A randomised controlled trial

  • Yea Ing L. Shyu*
  • , Jersey Liang
  • , Ming Yueh Tseng
  • , Hsiao Juan Li
  • , Chi Chuan Wu
  • , Huey Shinn Cheng
  • , Shih Wei Chou
  • , Ching Yen Chen
  • , Ching Tzu Yang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Meiho University
  • Chang Gung University
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Elderly patients with hip fracture have been found to benefit from subacute care interventions that usually comprise usual care with added geriatric intervention, early rehabilitation, and supported discharge. However, no studies were found on the effects of combining subacute care and health-maintenance interventions on health outcomes for elders with hip fracture. Objectives: To compare the effects of an interdisciplinary comprehensive care programme with those of subacute care and usual care programmes on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for elderly patients with hip fracture. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Settings: A 3000-bed medical centre in northern Taiwan. Participants: Patients with hip fracture (N = 299) were randomised into three groups: subacute care (n = 101), comprehensive care (n = 99), and usual care (n = 99). Methods: Subacute care included geriatric consultation, continuous rehabilitation, and discharge planning. Comprehensive care consisted of subacute care plus health-maintenance interventions to manage depressive symptoms, manage malnutrition, and prevent falls. Usual care included only 1-2 in-hospital rehabilitation sessions, discharge planning without environmental assessment, no geriatric consultation, and no in-home rehabilitation. HRQoL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Taiwan version at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Results: Participants in the comprehensive care group improved more in physical function, role physical, general health and mental health than those in the usual care group. The subacute care group had greater improvement in physical function, role physical, vitality, and social function than the usual care group. The intervention effects for both comprehensive and subacute care increased over time, specifically from 6 months after hip fracture onward, and reached a maximum at 12 months following discharge. Conclusions: Both comprehensive care and subacute care programmes may improve health outcomes of elders with hip fracture. Our results may provide a reference for health care providers in countries using similar programmes with Chinese/Taiwanese immigrant populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1013-1024
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume50
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger

Keywords

  • Comprehensive care
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Hip fracture
  • Subacute care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive and subacute care interventions improve health-related quality of life for older patients after surgery for hip fracture: A randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this