TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive assessment of actionable genomic alterations in primary colorectal carcinoma using targeted next-generation sequencing
AU - Jan, Yi Hua
AU - Tan, Kien Thiam
AU - Chen, Shu Jen
AU - Yip, Timothy Tak Chun
AU - Lu, Cu tai
AU - Lam, Alfred King yin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/10/19
Y1 - 2022/10/19
N2 - Background: The clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for guiding treatment has gradually become the standard-of-care procedure for colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Here, we comprehensively assess emerging targeted therapy biomarkers using CGP in primary CRC. Methods: A total of 575 primary CRCs were sequenced by ACTOnco® assay for genomic alterations, tumour mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Results: Eighteen percent of patients were detected as MSI-High (MSI-H), and the remaining cases were classified as microsatellite stable (MSS). Driver mutation prevalence in MSS CRCs were APC (74%), TP53 (67%), KRAS (47%), PIK3CA (21%) and BRAF (13%). The median TMBs for MSI-H and MSS patients were 37.8 mutations per mega base (mut/Mb) and 3.9 mut/Mb, respectively. Forty-seven percent of MSI-H CRC harboured at least one loss-of-function mutations in genes that may hamper immune checkpoint blockade. Among MSS RAS/RAF wild-type CRCs, 59% had at least one actionable mutation that may compromise the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy. For late-stage CRC, 51% of patients are eligible for standard care actionability and the remaining 49% could be enrolled in clinical trials with investigational drugs. Conclusions: This study highlights the essential role of CGP for identifying rational targeted therapy options in CRC.
AB - Background: The clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for guiding treatment has gradually become the standard-of-care procedure for colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Here, we comprehensively assess emerging targeted therapy biomarkers using CGP in primary CRC. Methods: A total of 575 primary CRCs were sequenced by ACTOnco® assay for genomic alterations, tumour mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). Results: Eighteen percent of patients were detected as MSI-High (MSI-H), and the remaining cases were classified as microsatellite stable (MSS). Driver mutation prevalence in MSS CRCs were APC (74%), TP53 (67%), KRAS (47%), PIK3CA (21%) and BRAF (13%). The median TMBs for MSI-H and MSS patients were 37.8 mutations per mega base (mut/Mb) and 3.9 mut/Mb, respectively. Forty-seven percent of MSI-H CRC harboured at least one loss-of-function mutations in genes that may hamper immune checkpoint blockade. Among MSS RAS/RAF wild-type CRCs, 59% had at least one actionable mutation that may compromise the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy. For late-stage CRC, 51% of patients are eligible for standard care actionability and the remaining 49% could be enrolled in clinical trials with investigational drugs. Conclusions: This study highlights the essential role of CGP for identifying rational targeted therapy options in CRC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134371001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-022-01913-4
DO - 10.1038/s41416-022-01913-4
M3 - 文章
C2 - 35842545
AN - SCOPUS:85134371001
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 127
SP - 1304
EP - 1311
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 7
ER -