Abstract
In this work, we firstly report on the rigorous design, optimization, and carbon emission analysis of the processes separating acrylonitrile (AN), acetonitrile (AC), and water. Two bi-sectional processes, which integrate heterogeneous extractive distillation with hybrid extraction-distillation (the HHED process), and that with pressure swing distillation (the HPSD process), are proposed. Compared with the existing configuration, operation using 30% less entrainer amount is found feasible for both processes, leading to 9.8% energy saving. Also, the optimized HHED process saves 4.8% total annual cost (TAC) and 5.8% carbon emission from the optimized HPSD process. Besides, implementing a vapor recompression cycle on the optimized HHED process reduces 31.1% CO2 emission but increases 6.6% of TAC. On the other hand, the heat-integrated HPSD process with an economizer design does not outperform the non-integrated HHED process. Finally, separation using heterogeneous azeotropic distillation or hybrid extraction-distillation process in single is conceptually rejected. Through this work, the industrial guidance could be provided.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 32-39 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers |
Volume | 122 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 05 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Keywords
- Acrylonitrile
- Carbon emission analysis
- Heterogeneous extractive distillation
- Hybrid extraction-distillation
- Simulated annealing