Conduction study of digital nerve function recovery following toe‐to‐digit transplantation and a comparison with digit‐to‐digit replantation

  • Nai‐Shin ‐S Chu*
  • , Eric C. Chu
  • , Jia‐Ming ‐M Yu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recovery of digital nerve function following toe‐to‐digit transplantation was studied by nerve conduction in 16 patients, and a comparison was made with digit‐to‐digit replantation in 7 patients. For toe transplantation and digit replantation, the mean interval between injury and surgery was 7 months and 8 h, respectively, while the mean interval between surgery and study was 39 months and 25 months, respectively. Sensory nerve action potentials (NAPs) from digital nerve stimulation were recorded at the wrist and the elbow, whereas mixed NAPs from median nerve stimulation at the wrist were recorded at the elbow. Sensory NAPs from stimulation of the transplanted toe were detectable in 14 patients and showed reduced amplitude, prolonged latency, and slowed conduction velocity. There was retrograde amplitude reductiond in the median nerve and in the proximal segment of the digital nerve. Sensory NAPs from the replanted digit were not different from those of to normal digit, nor was a retrograde effect observed. The present data indicate that digital nerve function recovery was incomplete in toe transplantation and nearly complete in digit replantation. The reasons for the differences in recovery following two types of nerve repair are discussed. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1257-1264
Number of pages8
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 1995

Keywords

  • digit replantation
  • nerve conduction study
  • nerve injury
  • restorative neurology
  • toe transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conduction study of digital nerve function recovery following toe‐to‐digit transplantation and a comparison with digit‐to‐digit replantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this