Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Corneal injury by anti-misting agent in swim goggles: A case report

  • Kai Ling Peng
  • , Ko Hua Chen*
  • , Wen Ming Hsu
  • , Hei Chung Ho
  • , Chien Cheng Chiang
  • , Yen Cheng Lee
  • , Jui Yang Lai
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • National Health Research Institutes Taiwan
  • National Tsing Hua University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To report a case of corneal injury by swim goggle anti-misting agent. Methods: Case report. Results: A 47-year-old man presented with ocular injury caused by swim goggle anti-misting agent. Two weeks previously, the patient felt sudden ocular pain and grit after pool water flooded his goggles while swimming. Before the patient's swim, a copious amount of anti-misting agent was sprayed inside his goggles. On examination, severe corneal epithelial defect and stroma edema of the right eye were noted. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/40. Right eye corneal thickness was 625 μm. Topical corticosteroids, antibiotic eye drops, and oral tetracycline were started. After 1 week of treatment, the epithelial defect of his right cornea improved slightly. Stromal edema decreased mildly. Epithelial defect persisted at 1 month follow-up. Right eye BCVA remained 20/40. Three months after treatment, the right eye epithelial defect healed completely. Mild diffuse superficial stromal opacity was noted. BCVA improved to 20/20. At 1-year follow-up, right eye corneal thickness was 547 μm, which was thinner than the left eye. Right eye corneal endothelial cell density measured approximately 1500 cells/mm 2, which was less than the left eye at 2300 cells/mm2. The faint, diffuse stromal opacity disappeared; however, white subepithelial plaques were noted in the cornea centers. After 1 month of treatment with topical corticosteroids, the plaques subsided completely. The corneas remained clear at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Anti-misting agent can cause severe corneal injuries, including persistent epithelial defects, stromal edema and opacity, endothelial cell loss, and subepithelial plaque.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-231
Number of pages4
JournalCornea
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 02 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-misting agent
  • Ethanol
  • Methanol
  • Ocular irritation
  • Surfactant

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corneal injury by anti-misting agent in swim goggles: A case report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this