COVID-19-related stress among emergency physicians: a scoping review protocol on the stressors and coping strategies

Sze Yuen Yau, Ching Yi Lee*, Hung Yi Lai, Ching Hsin Lee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

Abstract

Objective This scoping review aims to identify the COVID-19-related stressors and the corresponding coping strategies among emergency physicians during and following the pandemic. Introduction In the midst of an unprecedented COVID-19 crisis, healthcare professionals confront a diverse set of difficulties. Emergency physicians are under immense pressure. They must provide frontline care and make quick decisions in a high-pressure environment. This can lead to a variety of physical and psychological stressors, including extended working hours, increased workload, personal risk of infection and the emotional toll of caring for infected patients. It is critical that they be informed of the numerous stressors they face, as well as the various coping methods accessible to them, in order to deal with these pressures. Inclusion criteria This paper will summarise the findings of primary or secondary investigations on emergency physicians' stressors and coping strategies during and following the COVID-19 epidemic. All journals and grey literature in English and Mandarin published after January 2020 are eligible. Methods The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) method will be used to conduct the scoping review. A thorough literature search will be performed on OVID Medline, Scopus and Web of Science to find eligible studies, using the keywords related to emergency physicians, stress and coping strategies. Two reviewers will independently revise all of the full-text articles, extract data and evaluate the study quality. A narrative overview of the findings from included studies will be given. Ethics and dissemination This review will involve secondary analysis of published literature, and therefore ethics approval is not required. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist will be used to guide translation of findings. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented in conferences via abstract and presentation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere068085
Pages (from-to)e068085
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 03 03 2023

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • accident & emergency medicine
  • education & training (see medical education & training)
  • Pandemics
  • Physicians
  • Review Literature as Topic
  • Humans
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Stress, Psychological
  • Adaptation, Psychological

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COVID-19-related stress among emergency physicians: a scoping review protocol on the stressors and coping strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this