Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty

Raymond C.W. Goh, Cheng Nen Chang, Chun Li Lin, Lun Jou Lo*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reconstruction of cranial defects can be reasonably considered a failure if an aesthetically obvious cranial contour deformity persists after surgery. Such unsatisfactory outcome often results from variable resorption of bone grafts or infection, requiring removal of implant. In considering further treatment for such failed cases, the use of alloplastic implants is frequently warned as imprudent due to their theoretically increased potential for infection; however, the validity of such caution has never been substantiated. We describe a user-friendly, time- and cost-effective method of producing prefabricated methyl methacrylate implants for the reconstruction of cranial defects, using readily available computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture facilities. This method was carried out in 31 patients who presented with persistent cranial defects after previously failed cranioplasty. The efficacy of this technique and the clinical outcome of the patients in this series were analysed. All implants produced a precise fit, with a reduction in operating time and satisfactory cosmesis having been achieved. Infection that required removal of implant occurred in three patients (9.7%), and one patient developed a dural tear, requiring repair. Customised fabricated alloplastic implants provide a safe, accurate and efficient way of restoring normal cranial contours in patients with cranial defects who have had previous failed cranioplasties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1479-1484
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Volume63
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 09 2010

Keywords

  • Cranioplasty
  • Fabricated implant
  • Rapid prototyping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this