Abstract
The concept of occupation has long defied satisfactory definition by occupational therapists or occupational scientists. Recently, both Kielhofer and Nelson have attempted to define the term “occupation” in a manner that would reduce the ambiguity associated with uses of the term. This article compares and contrasts their conceptualizations of occupation, describing how the term occupation and related concepts have been defined and operationalized. The differences and similarities identified provide a basis for recommendations for the further development and validation of a definition of occupation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-12 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Occupational Science |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 04 1999 |
Keywords
- Construct and theory Research
- Occupation Construct and theory
- Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Defining occupation: A comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver