Defining the cut point between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: A clinicopathologic and molecular genetic analysis

  • Ayse Ayhan
  • , Robert J. Kurman
  • , Anna Yemelyanova
  • , Russell Vang
  • , Sanjay Logani
  • , Jeffrey D. Seidman
  • , Ie Ming Shih*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

A 2-tier grading system based on nuclear grade divides ovarian serous carcinomas into low (nuclear grade 1) and high grade (nuclear grade 3). In most instances the separation is straightforward but at times, the morphologic distinction between them can be difficult. We studied 11 ovarian serous carcinomas with features that were "intermediate" (nuclear grade 2) between low and high grade. All the cases were high staged and had a poor clinical outcome. None of the tumors showed mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and ERBB2 genes that characterize most low-grade serous carcinomas. In contrast, 10 (90.9%) of 11 cases contained nonsynonymous TP53 mutations characteristic of high-grade serous carcinomas. In summary, the molecular genetic profile and behavior of serous carcinomas with grade 2 nuclei are virtually the same as those of serous carcinomas with grade 3 nuclei, supporting the use of the 2-tier grading system for classifying ovarian serous carcinomas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1220-1224
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 08 2009
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • 2-tier grading system
  • Grade
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Serous carcinoma
  • TP53

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining the cut point between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: A clinicopathologic and molecular genetic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this