Abstract
Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a serious iatrogenic surgical complication. BDI most often occurs as a result of misidentification of the anatomy; however, clinical evidence on its precise mechanism and surgeons’ perceptions is scarce. Surgeons from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the USA, etc. (n = 614) participated in a questionnaire regarding their BDI experience and near-misses; and perceptions on landmarks, intraoperative findings, and surgical techniques. Respondents voted for a Delphi process and graded each item on a five-point scale. The consensus was built when ≥80% of overall responses were 4 or 5. Response rates for the first- and second-round Delphi were 60.6% and 74.9%, respectively. Misidentification of local anatomy accounted for 76.2% of BDI. Final consensus was reached on: (1) Effective retraction of the gallbladder, (2) Always obtaining critical view of safety, and (3) Avoiding excessive use of electrocautery/clipping as vital procedures; and (4) Calot's triangle area and (5) Critical view of safety as important landmarks. For (6) Impacted gallstone and (7) Severe fibrosis/scarring in Calot's triangle, bail-out procedures may be indicated. A consensus was reached among expert surgeons on relevant landmarks and intraoperative findings and appropriate surgical techniques to avoid BDI.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 591-602 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 11 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
Keywords
- Bile duct injury
- Critical view of safety
- Delphi consensus
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Surgical difficulty