Abstract
Design and optimization of different methods for propylene/propane separation in the downstream of the methanol-to-olefin process are investigated. Since propylene and propane have similar boiling points, a large number of trays and high energy are required when separating by a traditional single column with industrial low-pressure steam as reboiler heat source (TRA-LPS case). Some alternatives are studied, including the traditional column using waste hot water as heat resource (TRA-HW), implementation of a vapor recompression cycle (VRC) configuration, and extractive distillation (ED) with acetonitrile solution as entrainer. Compared to TRA-LPS, the total annual cost can be reduced significantly for TRA-HW and ED and to a minor extent for VCR. The required number of trays for separation is also clearly reduced for the three cases. It can be concluded that TRA-HW and ED are both promising alternatives for this separation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2304-2311 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Chemical Engineering and Technology |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 01 12 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Keywords
- Light olefin production
- Methanol-to-olefin process
- Propylene/propane separation
- Simulation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Design and Optimization of the Methanol-to-Olefin Process. Part II: Comparison of Different Methods for Propylene/Propane Separation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver