Dose impact of a brass aperture on low dose tails for a proton wobbling nozzle with a multileaf collimator — A Monte Carlo study

Chung Chi Lee, Chia Jung Wu, Hsiao Chieh Huang, Shu Wei Wu, Siou Yin Cai, Kang Hsing Fan, Ji Hong Hong, Chuan Jong Tung, Chien Hau Chu, Tsi Chian Chao*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

At the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, a wobbled beam together with a set of single scatterers produces a uniform proton field at the first and second gantries for proton radiotherapy. Conformal field shaping was accomplished by using only a multileaf collimator (MLC) or a combination of an MLC and a brass aperture (downstream of the MLC). The MLC-only technique typically delivered extra low dose tails in penumbra compared to the dose delivered using both the MLC and brass aperture/block. This study attempted to provide a physical explanation of this phenomenon by Monte Carlo simulation and phase space analysis. The Particle Therapy System Simulation Framework was used as the Monte Carlo tool for beam propagation simulation. This research team investigated four possible causes for low dose tails including, (a) same-side MLC scattering; (b) opposite-side MLC scattering; (c) MLC transmission; and (d) proton angular distribution broadened by the wobbling magnets. The results indicated that the proton angular distribution broadened by the wobbling magnets is the single cause of low dose tails and can be stopped by inserting a downstream brass aperture.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108367
JournalRadiation Physics and Chemistry
Volume167
DOIs
StatePublished - 02 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Brass aperture
  • Low dose tail
  • Multileaf collimator
  • Proton therapy
  • Wobbling technique

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dose impact of a brass aperture on low dose tails for a proton wobbling nozzle with a multileaf collimator — A Monte Carlo study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this