Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Enhancement analysis on BI-RADS 4 non-mass microcalcifications in ScreenedWomen

  • Yun Chung Cheung
  • , Yu Hsiang Juan
  • , Yu Ching Lin
  • , Yung Feng Lo
  • , Hsiu Pei Tsai
  • , Shir Hwa Ueng
  • , Shin Cheh Chen
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Chang Gung University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Mammography screening is a cost-efficient modality with high sensitivity for detecting impalpable cancer with microcalcifications, and results in reduced mortality rates. However, the probability of finding microcalcifications without associated cancerous masses varies.We retrospectively evaluated the diagnosis and cancer probability of the non-mass screened microcalcifications by dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (DE-CESM). Patients and Methods With ethical approval from our hospital, we enrolled the cases of DE-CESM for analysis under the following inclusion criteria: (1) referrals due to screened BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications; (2) having DE-CESM prior to stereotactic biopsy; (3) no associated mass found by sonography and physical examination; and (4) pathology-based diagnosis using stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. We analyzed the added value of post-contrast enhancement on DE-CESM. Results A total of 94 biopsed lesions were available for analysis in our 87 women, yielding 27 cancers [19 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 8 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)], 32 premalignant and 35 benign lesions. Of these 94 lesions, 33 showed associated enhancement in DE-CESM while the other 61 did not. All 8 IDC (100%) and 16 of 19 DCIS (84.21%) showed enhancement, but the other 3 DCIS (15.79%) did not. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 88.89%, 86.56%, 72.72%, 95.08% and 87.24%, respectively. The performances of DE-CESM on both amorphous and pleomorphic microcalcifications were satisfactory (AUC 0.8 and 0.92,respectively). The pleomorphous microcalcifications with enhancement showed higher positive predictive value (90.00% vs 46.15%, p = 0.013) and higher cancer probability than the amorphous microcalcifications (46.3% VS 15.1%). The Odds Ratio was 4.85 (95% CI: 1.84-12.82). Conclusion DE-CESM might provide added value in assessing the non-mass screened breast microcalcification, with enhancement favorable to the diagnosis of cancers or lack of enhancement virtually diagnostic for non-malignant lesions or noninvasive subgroup cancers.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0162740
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume11
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 09 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Cheung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Enhancement analysis on BI-RADS 4 non-mass microcalcifications in ScreenedWomen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this