Effect of a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Chi Hsin Chiang, Ming Yang Chang*, Chii Shinn Shiau, Hung Chih Hou, T'Sang T.Ang Hsieh, Yung Kuei Soong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to study the effect of a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Methods: Nineteen primary infertility patients undergoing IVF-ET who had a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses were enrolled. An age- controlled group of 144 primary infertility patients undergoing IVF-ET with a normal uterus and no history of uterine surgery was included. Results: The age, day 3 follicle stimulating hormone, antral follicle count, ovarian response, endometrial thickness, number of retrieved and fertilized oocytes, number of transferred embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, and total delivery rate were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients with a sonographically diffused enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses had a higher spontaneous abortion rate (66. 7%) than controls (P < 0.04; odds ratio = 7.5;95% confidence interval, 1.16-48.56). Conclusions: A high spontaneous abortion rate was found in patients with a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses undergoing IVF-ET. Enhanced luteal support was required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-372
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • IVF-ET
  • Pregnancy outcome
  • Sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus
  • Spontaneous abortion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this