Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplant recipients: 12-month results of a randomized multicenter study

  • Long Bin Jeng*
  • , Sung Gyu Lee
  • , Arvinder Singh Soin
  • , Wei Chen Lee
  • , Kyung Suk Suh
  • , Dong Jin Joo
  • , Shinji Uemoto
  • , Jaewon Joh
  • , Tomoharu Yoshizumi
  • , Horng Ren Yang
  • , Gi Won Song
  • , Patricia Lopez
  • , Jossy Kochuparampil
  • , Carole Sips
  • , Shuhei Kaneko
  • , Gary Levy
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • University of Ulsan
  • Medanta (The Medicity)
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Seoul National University
  • Yonsei University
  • Kyoto University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Kyushu University
  • Novartis
  • Novartis USA
  • University of Toronto

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article peer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a multicenter, open-label, study, 284 living-donor liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 ± 5 days posttransplant to start everolimus+reduced tacrolimus (EVR+rTAC) or continue standard tacrolimus (TAC Control). EVR+rTAC was non-inferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint of treated BPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplant: difference –0.7% (90% CI −5.2%, 3.7%); P <.001 for non-inferiority. Treated BPAR occurred in 2.2% and 3.6% of patients, respectively. The key secondary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, achieved non-inferiority (P <.001 for non-inferiority), but not superiority and was similar between groups overall (mean −8.0 vs. −12.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, P =.108), and in patients continuing randomized treatment (−8.0 vs. −13.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, P =.046). In the EVR+rTAC and TAC control groups, study drug was discontinued in 15.5% and 17.6% of patients, adverse events with suspected relation to study drug occurred in 57.0% and 40.4%, and proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h in 9.3% and 0%, respectively. Everolimus did not negatively affect liver regeneration. At 12 months, hepatocellular recurrence was only seen in the standard TAC-treated patients (5/62; 8.1%). In conclusion, early introduction of EVR+rTAC was non-inferior to standard tacrolimus in terms of efficacy and renal function at 12 months, with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence only in TAC Control patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01888432.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1435-1446
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 06 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • clinical research/practice
  • immunosuppressant - mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR)
  • immunosuppression/immune modulation
  • lung (allograft) function/dysfunction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplant recipients: 12-month results of a randomized multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this