Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy of pharmacologic treatment in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  • Jiann Jy Chen
  • , Yen Wen Chen
  • , Bing Yan Zeng
  • , Chao Ming Hung
  • , Bing Syuan Zeng
  • , Brendon Stubbs
  • , Andre F. Carvalho
  • , Trevor Thompson
  • , Michael Roerecke
  • , Kuan Pin Su
  • , Yu Kang Tu
  • , Yi Cheng Wu
  • , Lee Smith
  • , Tien Yu Chen
  • , Pao Yen Lin
  • , Chih Sung Liang
  • , Chih Wei Hsu
  • , Shih Pin Hsu
  • , Hung Chang Kuo
  • , Ming Kung Wu*
  • Ping Tao Tseng
*Corresponding author for this work
  • E-Da Cancer Hospital
  • Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology
  • I-Shou University
  • King's College London
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • Deakin University
  • University of Greenwich
  • University of Toronto
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • National Taiwan University
  • Landseed International Hospital
  • Anglia Ruskin University
  • Triservice General Hospital Taiwan
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Chang Gung University
  • National Defense Medical University
  • National Sun Yat-sen University
  • Asia University Taiwan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal Article › peer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although tinnitus has a prevalence between 20 and 42.8%, the currently recommended management for tinnitus, such as tinnitus support and psychologic therapies, are relatively time-consuming and expensive. Several new pharmacologic treatments designed for tinnitus patients without specific origin had been developed but their efficacy remains unclear. Methods: The current Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacologic treatments for tinnitus management in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin (i.e. primary tinnitus). Databases were searched from inception to April 5th, 2021. All network meta-analytic procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. We calculated the effect size of outcomes with different rating scales with standardized mean difference. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020177742. Findings: Overall, 36 RCTs were included with 2,761 participants. The main results revealed that pharmacologic interventions with brain-acting effect (for example, amitriptyline, acamprosate, and gabapentin) and those with anti-inflammation/anti-oxidant effect (for example, intra-tympanic dexamethasone injection plus oral melatonin) were associated with superior improvement in tinnitus severity and response rate compared to placebo/control. Oral amitriptyline were associated with the highest improvement in tinnitus severity and the fourth highest response rate. None of the investigated interventions was associated with different changes in quality of life compared to placebo/control. All the investigated treatments were associated with similar drop-out rate to placebo/control. Interpretation: The current NMA suggests a potential role for treatments with brain-acting effect (for example, amitriptyline, acamprosate, and gabapentin) or anti-inflammation/anti-oxidant effect (for example, intra-tympanic dexamethasone injection plus oral melatonin) as the preferable effective treatments for tinnitus without specific or treatable origin. Funding: none.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101080
JournaleClinicalMedicine
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - 09 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of pharmacologic treatment in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this